An Apple Dilemma
Macbook or iPad for my school?
This is a fresh debate. And one where the question should perhaps be ‘laptop or tablet device?’. Another question which i’m certain has echoed around many a principals office is ‘should we engage in a personal digital education at all?’
It only seems like yesterday when we were trying our hardest to banish all mobile phones from the school grounds and now we find ourselves equipping kids with even more powerful, ever decreasing in size communication devices.
Tablet computers are an all round seductive device. The package itself is small but heavy, reminiscent of an expensive christmas gift. It is tied in a beautiful silk bow which unravels itself to reveal glossy glass and polished aluminium. The rich and vivid colours of the display ooze quality and class. “This is where education should be! How can we possibly go wrong with each child equipped with one of these things? I mean they can hold every book ever made, right?”
I am going to assume that you are at the stage of ‘We want a 1:1 environment’ and I am also going to focus on the Apple Macbook and iPad. I aim to share with you my first hand experiences so that you might make a decision between OS X or iOS.
OS X or iOS?
Don’t worry I am not about to start discussing the benefits of an ARM processor over an Intel chip. OS refers to the Operating System, the platform if you like which really provides the user experience. OS X is the MacBook operating system and iOS refers to the iPad platform, and it is here where you are truly making your decision.
Recently a principal from a developing school here in Australia approached me asking for my opinion. He said to me;
“We are in a fortunate position where we chose not to jump 2 years ago into a fleet of Apple notebooks. Now we can wisely invest into providing a 1:1 iPad environment into our school”
Adamant in the fact that by A, not acting 2 years ago was the right thing to do and that B, the iPad was beyond any doubt the right way to proceed surprised me a little. With a completely unknown track record the decision to go with an iPad is often one which has already been made after fore-mentioned disrobing of the alluring device and not after extensive trial or research.
After all OS X had been in development for over 8 years. With the likes of Microsoft Office, industry standard design tools from the Adobe suite and full access to online technologies such as Flash we knew where we stood. This platform offered a truly flexible learning environment, as a teacher we could pick and choose media and content which complemented our syllabus as we chose to teach it. Not restricted by Apps as vetted by Apple staff.
OS X has proven itself to be an outstanding study partner. The Macbook offers sturdy design and a long battery life. Certainly in my experience students take well to the iLife suite. Podcasting, and movie making is a snap for most. It is a platform which I am an ardent fan of, one which prepares the students properly for careers where word processing and spreadsheet manipulation is essential. Learning on a Mac teaches other basic computer skills such as file handling and touch typing. Without these skills we are simply not preparing students properly for a digital future ahead of them.
My discussion with the curious principal continued. We crooned over the features and portability of the iPad, the medium to low price tag and the ‘third dimension’ of its touch screen. Eventually our conversation developed further into the integration of the device into classrooms and into the hands of teachers.
Classroom trials of the iPad have been met with mixed responses. In terms of an ebook reader it certainly shines. Finding the correct ebooks however has been difficult. But this is changing. Teacher attitudes have also began to shift and I think there is a clear focus on content creation from the school itself. Creating PDF documents, and interactive iBooks is now a very simple task. Getting those digital formats onto the iPad is also becoming simpler, sought of.
That Syncing feeling.

The iPad, in anything but a 1:1 consumer situation is very difficult.
For years I didn’t believe that ‘syncing’ was actually a word. That was until I became a proud owner of an iPhone and entered the Apple eco-system. Syncing isn’t a word that normal people use. It is a slang term which now represents the painful mine field of multiple Apple ID’s and mysterious windows asking you if its ok to “Erase and Sync?”.
It is almost the first task which an administrator of 2 or more iPads in a classroom situation will need to do. How difficult can this be? I’m perfectly happy to purchase a school license, can’t I just double click the install file?
For months I researched this topic, trying to find a fix which doesn’t break the 35 page long App Store T&C’s. There are a few convoluted solutions involving distribution of gift cards or iTunes credit, but why is it that Apple make everything so simple but this is so complex? And i’m still not sure how ethical it is that every student must exchange their personal details with Apple for an Apple ID.
There does seem to be a solution coming via ‘App Store Volume Purchasing’ but for the moment we must wait.
Apple have also answered many device management questions and using the right set of tools it is possible to lock down an iPad and restrict access to certain components. (such as the camera or the Safari internet browser). So with the right implementation shared devices in a school may work well.
With the tight control of Apples Apps and personal ID’s it all feels a little overwhelming. Never before on a Windows machine or OS X did it all feel so difficult, however playing by Apple’s rules might have some very positive impacts on education…
Pedagogical Values
A sand-boxed user experience is the first thing that hit me when I used the iPad. This meant that apart from the clock and battery indicator there were no other distractions when I was using an App. There is no cluttered desktop behind floating windows or header icons vying for my attention. So I was focused on the task at hand. This is a highly under rated feature and one which comes into its own in the classroom.
Multi-tasking for a modern student is when they are typing 3 essays at once while researching online, updating Facebook and streaming a video. Now you just cannot do all of these things simultaneously on the iPad. And that is a good thing for teachers trying to maintain a single focus in class.
It is for this reason that the iPad is truly chameleon like. It is a scientific calculator for a science period. It is an atlas for another and a musical keyboard for another. On the way home the iPad becomes a magazine and at night your bedtime book.
The way in which information is provided and accessed is revolutionary on the iPad. ‘Our Choice’ is an application developed with Al Gore as narrator. It is the most encapsulating, interactive digital book available, and the content is incredible. The touch screen is used beautifully to allow the user to engage fully with examples of solar power and wind density throughout America. It uses the built in microphone as another way in which the student can engage with the content. Just in this app alone I think a teacher could guide a student through an entire term of Society and Environment studies.
Gallery is an application which presents over 1100 pictures from the National Gallery in London. The collection of pictures can be sorted by date or artist. With the ability to pinch, zoom and study the pictures it has outstanding value in the art class.
The entire works of Shakespeare downloaded in minutes for free. Bram Stoker, Jane Austen and Oscar Wilde to name just a few are all free via the Ebook reader. Quickly my initial thoughts that this device was better suited for junior school students learning their ABC were proved wrong.
As I evaluate the many geography & history apps I gasp in disappointment that I didn’t have access to such interactive maps and animated detail when I was a student.
Indeed any science teacher would drool at the classroom support provided for learning the periodic table or even studying astronomy through the touch screen which literally brings the skies to life.
Never before has such a repository of information been available to assist teacher and student. The App Store is just starting to take shape. In the years to come one can only imagine the ingenious forms that apps will take as developers and educators continue to out trump each other.
The iPad has been equipped with an exceptionally powerful processor. It is equipped with three-axis gyro sensor as well as an accelerometer, and light sensor. It also has a built in digital compass and 2 cameras. What does this all mean? It means that the hardware is capable of so much more. The software development will never be hindered by lacking hardware. The journey is just beginning, the future a bright beacon of LED-backlit glossy widescreen Multi-Touch display with IPS technology. IPS technology? i’m not sure either but I do have faith that this investment might be the right one.
Conclusion
Undoubtedly the iPad in education is finding its feet. The Macbook will, for the time being continue to be a safe choice, especially in its latest incarnation, the MacBook Air.
My recent findings have concluded that the iPad is a superior form for accessing data and assisting in student consumption/learning. However I have found the creation of original content on the iPad to be not as fast or dynamic when compared to the Macbook. Although I am certain that youth today will take to the screen keyboard and pinch-pull zooming etc very quickly. It is of course possible to use external bluetooth keyboards, but I personally feel that this defeats the point a little.
After extensive experience with year 7 – 12 students and observing the ways that they are using their personal MacBooks, it seems clear to me that the majority of time is spent on internet browsing/research and word processing.
Adobe Photoshop is used extensively. The note taking software Inspiration and media creation tools iMovie and Garageband seem to be the next biggest use of students time, (closely followed by gaming and social networking). Most of these applications are easily substituted with counterparts on the iPad.
The school computer labs were, I thought becoming a thing of the past. But the idea of a lab existing along side an iPad 1:1 environment is a practice which would work well. It is here that you may choose to conduct Photoshop training. You may also choose to have a ‘Pro’ suite set up allowing students to learn film editing or 3D research for example. It is these labs that enable the student to experience conventional desktop computing and also skills such as touch typing.
I would not like to be in the position where I am tearing the MacBook from the hands of tech savvy students to replace them with iPads. But to be able to join my students in what can only be described as a journey of immersive learning where almost limitless resources are just a tap away is an opportunity too good to miss out on.
Apple have consistently listened to and addressed issues raised from the education sector. I am anticipating that the arrival of the App Store Volume Purchasing for education in Australia will be the final part of the jig-saw. Combine this with a carefully planned deployment and iOS 5 arriving this summer and the iPad is looking like a good choice.
No related posts.



I work in education as an IT specialist offering training and support to students and teachers. My role sees me engage with parents, management staff and administration providing continuous support and solutions. I am highly regarded as an Apple expert and my position makes me privy to the real, day to day problems faced by teachers. My portfolio of tutorials, notes and video guides hold tremendous pedagogical value and are a record of successful integration of technology into the curriculum. 
Nicely written, but ultimately flawed,
“Learning on a Mac teaches other basic computer skills such as file handling and touch typing. Without these skills we are simply not preparing students properly for a digital future ahead of them.”
A good point that you failed to address.
“A sand-boxed user experience is the first thing that hit me when I used the iPad. This meant that apart from the clock and battery indicator there were no other distractions when I was using an App. There is no cluttered desktop behind floating windows or header icons vying for my attention. So I was focused on the task at hand. This is a highly under rated feature and one which comes into its own in the classroom.”
Soooo, this “feature” you speak of, is the inability to multi-task, and the fact that the “app” is full screen (a feature OSX has just implemented unless I am mistaken).
“Gallery is an application which presents over 1100 pictures from the National Gallery in London. The collection of pictures can be sorted by date or artist. With the ability to pinch, zoom and study the pictures it has outstanding value in the art class.”
http://www.googleartproject.com/museums/nationalgallery
A FREE web site where you can actually wander around the National Gallery (like street view), the paintings have been captured in fantastic gigapixel detail, and the history of works is available to all. It is better than the app you describe. It is free unlike the app you describe. It uses Adobe Flash so would NOT be accessible from the iPad, thus forcing schools to purchase expensive apps as a poor substitute. I am sure Apple will be happy with their 30% cut though.
“The entire works of Shakespeare downloaded in minutes for free. Bram Stoker, Jane Austen and Oscar Wilde to name just a few are all free via the Ebook reader. Quickly my initial thoughts that this device was better suited for junior school students learning their ABC were proved wrong.”
http://www.gutenberg.org/
Project Gutenberg offers over 36,000 free ebooks to download to your PC
http://books.google.com/
Search the latest index of the world’s books. Find millions of great books you can preview or read for free.
http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/
Listing over 1 million free books on the Web.
“The iPad has been equipped with an exceptionally powerful processor.”
It is no more powerful than an Intel Atom processor used in cheap net-tops costing half the price of the iPad.
“Adobe Photoshop is used extensively. The note taking software Inspiration and media creation tools iMovie and Garageband seem to be the next biggest use of students time, (closely followed by gaming and social networking). Most of these applications are easily substituted with counterparts on the iPad.”
Counterparts? Why? They are not as comprehensive and severely limited. Just get them a Macbook and they can create content that isn’t locked into the device and has real world application. Or better yet get them a Windows laptop that is cheaper than both devices, has more software than these devices and is used in well over 90% of businesses worldwide.
Points you failed to mention:
The iPad requires all software to be bought through Apple (who take a 30% cut).
All software has to be approved by Apple, delaying the release of software, and ultimately giving an American company the final say on what can be accessed.
Most interactive learning and education sites use Flash, so are completely inaccessible on the iPad.
In conclusion the iPad is looking like a terrible choice for schools, it would set back computer literacy by decades, and condemn an entire generation into thinking that a computer is something you watch tv on, and prod with your fingers.
Some excellent points made. Also thank you for the links to the online resources.
All of the apps which I mentioned (apart from Al Gore’s ‘Choice’) were in fact free from the Apple App Store.
He did win a Nobel Peace prize (well half of one), those things don’t come cheap…
Aaah, Alistair…
Ultimately flawed? Such hyperbole!
“Most education sites use Flash”? Bah!
All software has to be approved by Apple? And this is bad because? Do you think most people actually care about that? Apple certainly has the best quality control of any hardware manufacturer whose products I have used!
You have have underlined the quality of your opinion by suggesting the purchase of a Windows machine in a post that is, essentially, about Apple products. The Apple-hater has little credibility, particularly in a professional realm where people are trying to make serious decisions.
Set back computer literacy by decades? It sounds to me like your version of computer literacy is perhaps a little skewed. Decades ago people said the same thing about laptops. And before that, the computer itself was slated as a machine that would kill writing.
Why would you bother entering into this debate, if you aren’t interested in either of the positions that it proposes?
Doug: out of interest, the iPad has changed the way I interact with my class and the world. I am a teacher, and firmly believe that there is no device (yet?) that fits all uses. This makes the school decision very difficult.
I, like you, can see the computer lab as returning to schools. Kids using iPads for their daily requirements (a bit of typing, content viewing, multiple-media creation, research…) and attending labs to learn more high end skills, like quality media creation/editing etc.
Personally, I use an iPad for around 90% of my own computer needs. I resort to the laptop if I have multiple tasks to do simultaneously. I’d love the iPad to have better multitasking, but I can see how this would kill the battery quickly.
Thanks for the post (and the cross-post on Slide2Learn!).
Most educational sites DO use Flash, I myself worked for a company that developed Maths educational games for schools, and they exclusively used Flash, and as far as I know they still do. I don’t think Bah! is going counteract this point.
I suggested Windows as an alternative, where cost is a concern (as the iPad is cheaper than the Macbook). The fact is that Windows laptops are cheaper than both, and it is a computer environment overwhelmingly used by businesses in the real world. I made no hateful comments about Apple, and out of the two options I thought I was clearly supporting the use of Macbooks over the iPad.
The iPad is overwhelmingly a consumption device. Moreover what you consume has to be approved and purchased through Apple, who get final say on whether you will be allowed to see or purchase content, and will also take a cut. If you cannot see the difference between this consumption, restrictive distribution model, and a traditional computing environment, then I cannot help you.
Whether Apple have great quality control or not is irrelevant, they are not the ones who should be deciding these matters. By backing the iPad as an educational tool, you are effectively entrusting the content choices to an external company. While I can appreciate the arguments for a locked down controlled computing environment, I think having an open system (at least to the school administrators) is ultimately more practical, and would avoid unforeseen complications in the future.
So yes, choosing to deploy iPads, is an ultimately flawed choice.
Ultimately, it depends upon what you want.
At no point, Alistair, have you even considered the mobility factor.
If the choice came down to one or the other, for education, I would choose the MacBook, as it has possibilities for much higher order tasks like programming and 3D design.
The iPad, however, provides a large percentage of the daily, personal computing needs of students. Coupled with possible access to laptops (or a desktop lab), students can have their communication and consumption needs met everywhere they go, and gain their higher order IT skills as required.
Here’s a story for you, with regard to (not even cheap) Windows laptops: I was at a school that had just had Gigabit Internet connected. We were very excited to get a demo of the 790Mbps speeds we were told were available. The it manager at this school grabbed a student laptop, pressed the power button, after which we waited almost 3 minutes for it to boot up. He then logged in, and after it finished syncing almost 7 minutes later, he was able to open IE and do a speed test for us.
Sure, a fairly extreme case, but even if it had have taken 3 minutes to switch on and log in to their server, my iPad was on net in under 15 seconds. Save 2 minutes every time you access your device equals days of extra time over the course of a year.
As for quality control, I would rather someone else spend their time (and money) making sure things work properly, are secure from viruses, and don’t ruin the user experience. It is a well known fact in my area that Apple machines have less down time in a school setting (or business) than Windows machines and this comes from a variety of schools that use both.. Not that this post was even considering a Windows option, though.
As for flash: my Bah! Is as good as your ‘ultimately flawed’. I am an early adopter of technology, a teacher, and one who rarely uses flash-based sites for teaching. Education is about so much more than information transfer, something which most flash based sites are about. Sure, there are some web 2.0 apps that use flash (Voicethread, for eg) but most a jumping on the iOS bandwagon and creating native apps, or moving to html5″ which is universal.
And with more than half a million apps available, I’d hardly call that locked down. There are too many to make choosing a simple task!
Out of interest, Alistair, are you a teacher? My guess is that you aren’t. Or you are an IT specialist. I’m interested in your context, to know where you are coming from.
Where did you get your stats from, too? Well over 90% of businesses worldwide use Windows. Most educational sites use flash. Big calls!
The iPad is a brilliant companion to the PC, and a great option as a 1:1 device if your goals are collaborating and communicating in modern ways. The laptop doesn’t even come close when using things like Skype to give a guided tour of a school, apps like Explain Everything (animated screencasts) for kids to show their understanding (so much better than 50 problems or any flash-based, animated worksheet), but if you want to teach kids IT skills, you must have access to ‘real’ computers. This article is flawed, as it implies that you can have one OR the other. The question should be about how you can incorporate BOTH for better learning.